Archives Under "news" (RSS)
Issue of homelessness in Vancouver gains critical mass
23 October 2006 | news, vancouver | 1 Response
In the wake of this morning’s news about the Northstar Squat, I wanted to point out this fantastic post from Sean Orr of Beyond Robson. The post links to an excellent variety of resources and campaigns about Vancouver’s epidemic of homelessness. Check it out!
Northstar Squatted
23 October 2006 | news, vancouver | No Responses
From Vancouver Indymedia:
Sunday October 22, 2006 — At 4:30 (PST) one hundred and fifty housing activists turned out to open a squatted building in Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside at 5 West Hastings Street. The North Star Hotel had been sitting empty since 1999 since it was ordered shut down by Vancouver City Council.
The Anti-Poverty Committee (APC) squat could provide homes for 30 local residents in a city where hundreds sleep outside each night. APC supporters chanted “Homes Not Games” and are asking the City of Vancouver to purchase the building for housing, rather than spending money on hosting the 2010 Olympics. Large 30 foot banners were unfurled from the top floor protesting the Olympics Games and the lack of affordable housing.
I heard the APC’s David Cunningham on the radio this morning, and I was quite impressed with his version of the APC’s position. According to David, the specific purpose of this squat is to pressure NPA politicians into fulfilling their election promise of purchasing at least one old downtown eastside hotel per year to convert for affordable housing. The year is almost up, he said, and since the NPA has done nothing in the way of fulfilling this promise, the APC is occupying this hotel (on the final day of Homelessness Awareness Week) to ‘get the ball rolling’.
The police are apparently meeting with the City today to decide their official position on the squat. David says the APC has a host of other tactics ready should the police break this squat before there is action from the NPA.
It’s just over 4 years since the Woodwards building was squatted, which was a complicated kind of victory for the homeless (or at least for homeless activists). Woodwards precipitated the opening of the Stanley Newfountain Hotel for social housing, while also pressuring the city into providing at least 100 affordable social housing units in the upcoming Woodward’s development.
I’ll be very interested to see how this squat unfolds, and whether the APC can impact the current NPA-dominated council to the same degree that activists and community members were able to impact the COPE council four years ago.
GVRD Legislates Recycling of E-Waste
15 October 2006 | miscellaneous, news, vancouver | No Responses
I mean, I think that’s what’s happening, anyway… According to Dave Watson (of Dot Comment fame), the GVRD has passed legislation that will soon require e-waste to be diverted from the regular waste stream (yeck - a garbage stream) to soon-to-be-created official drop-off facilities.
I did a little research (and I mean a little), and I turned up this article (from my old employer, the North Shore Recycling Program, no less!) that seems to confirm Dave’s good news. According to the article, the GVRD, in partnership with Encorp Pacific & the EPSC, will be implementing an electronic product stewardship program by summer 2007. While the fine details of the plan are still being developed, it looks like the first instance of the program will allow for recycling of the basics: personal computers, monitors, televisions, laptop computers and printers. The program will be financed in part by ‘environmental handling fees’ that will be collected on all electronics products at the time of purchase. (For more info, check out the EPSC website.)
I think this is great news. I used to work at a recycling facility in North Van where one could only recycle computers as scrap metal, while tv’s, printers, etc. were just plain garbage. Obviously there’s a lot of valuable material that can be reclaimed from these things, but there’s never been an infrastructure here that allowed for easy collection & reclamation. This new partnership will mean (literally) tons of waste diverted from the garbage dump. Huzzah!
Dan Savage announces new podcast
24 August 2006 | miscellaneous, news | No Responses
Everyone’s favourite misanthropic sex advice columnist, Dan Savage, announced plans this week to start a podcast. And, as if that’s not cool enough on its own, his podcast will feature answers to questions posed via answering machine. Check it out:
Have you ever wanted to ask me a question but lost your nerve or sobered up before you could send me an email? Well, now you’ll be able to drunk-dial me and record a question from the comfort of that bar, washroom, bedroom, or dungeon. The number: 206-201-2720. Call and ask, I’ll listen and advise.
I’m soooo excited! He promises to announce the official launch in an upcoming column. Until then, read his great advice over at The Onion AV Club (or wherever else you want — I just wanted to use this as an excuse to point out that The Onion is a drupal site, in case you didn’t know.)
Dispatches from NetSquared — Day 1, part 2
1 June 2006 | miscellaneous, elsewhere, news, socialsignal | No Responses
I was going to say that I wish I had made more time earlier today to blog the rest of yesterday's sessions for folks to read about, but you know, I really don't wish that at all. I spent the second day of the NetSquared conference fully engaged, and I wouldn't trade the time I've spent with people here for anything.
That said, though, now that the five of us who remain here in our swank silicon valley hotel are gone to bed & there's no more to talk about, I feel like it's okay to fit in a little writing. So, as promised, here's some more highlights from Tuesday afternoon.
Distributed Grassroots Marketing
This session featured Elisa Camahort, Tara Hunt & Chris Messina. It was (im)moderated by the invincible Marnie Webb. This is the one session during which I took stellar notes. I think it was because it was pretty noteable — well-prepared and well-facilitated, not to mention incredibly educational.
The point of this session was to discuss how grassroots marketing works in an online context & to develop strategies for creating critical mass around an issue, event or product so that it takes on a life of its own in the community. I wasn't sure that I'd be all that into it, really, but I was pleasantly surprised to find that the presentation, particularly Tara Hunt's portion, was actually super-interesting. It's easy to recap the high points, since Tara's portion of the presentation outlined 5 straightforward & simple concepts that make grassroots marketing campaigns successful.
Here's her list:
-
Maximize inbound rather than outbound messages.
- Elites and 'thought-leaders' are not as influential as they once were. The most influential groups in peoples lives are amateurs and peers. Spend time working to let those people in.
-
Be a community advocate, not a company evangelist.
- Learn to take feedback about your company or org, and allow that feedback in turn to help you tailor your product/service to better serve the needs of your community. People love that stuff.
-
Practice 100% authenticity.
- There was a great question from the audience about the difficulty of communicating authenticity. Chris weighed in to say that the way to earn peoples' trust in this regard is to thoroughly document your journey. People will get a sense of who you are through your personal (or organizational) history… you just have to let them have access to that history somehow.
-
Cater to the long tail
-
Under-represented audiences grow, whereas older, more 'conventional' audiences hardly ever do. Plus, working with under-represented audiences is cheap!
-
Follow open-source principles
- Let your users see how you did what you've done, and let them learn from you.
- Allow your users to drive your project to its destination. Create an API & allow people to freely re-mix your technology.
There were many great questions from the floor, too — check out Sarah Pullman's live-blog notes for more info.
Gender & the Social Web
This was the event that I was most excited about. I spend a lot of time thinking about (offline) social issues related to the construction of gender, and I'm thrilled to know that people are pushing to make gender a central issue in our online communities, too.
But I have to say, the session wasn't exactly what I expected. I had hoped for a great discussion about ways to a) push out gender as an issue online, make inequities visible & create 'best-practice' style solutions, and b) broaden the incredibly narrow understanding of gender in the world of digital identity. The session was actually more of a 'state of the woman on the internet'; a kind of round-up of success stories. Which is also super-cool — don't get me wrong. It was great to hear about the successes of Blogher, the Omidyar network & Moms Rising in fostering gender-neutrality on the web. I was disappointed, though, that the conversation wasn't more dynamic. Gender was ever expressed in binary terms, and success seemed to be measured by gender parity, which I felt was a little shy of awesome. I was reminded by a good friend, though, that this is still a pretty young conversation in the online domain. There's still lots of time to push it in all directions.
One very interesting thread that emerged during the conversation was that the trend toward 'bottom-up' organizing in the open source community is very much in keeping with principles of feminist organization often seen in activist communities. Changing the timbre of social movements is all about changing the nexus of control, and it was inspiring to think about open-source models as successful contemporary examples of non-heirarchical structures that work incredibly well.
The panel discussion included Catherine Geanuracos, Christine Herron, Fran Maier & Lisa Stone. It was facilitated wonderfully (really — the facilitation was impressive) by Susan Mernit. For more information, check out the session page. (I couldn't find the live blog notes this morning when I looked for them…)
I'm going to cut it off here. There was also one other session that I attended during the day, which was a discussion about Social Networking, but I was embroiled in tech support work for the NetSquared site, so I didn't get to pay very close attention. I'll try to add my notes from 'day 2: twice as awesome' later today. Woot!
Dispatches from NetSquared — Day 1
31 May 2006 | miscellaneous, elsewhere, news, socialsignal | No Responses
Wow. Day 1 was amazing.
The conversations were inspiring, the presentations were interesting and very lively, but overall, the best part by far is hanging out with all these cool people. Having worked remotely on the NetSquared site for the last 6 months, I've developed great relationships with a lot of the folks at Techsoup and Compumentor, so it's been awesome to finally make f2f connections with these super-super-super people. And meeting the 'strangers' in the room has been equally amazing. It's impossibly exciting to me to be in the company of so many people doing good work in the world.
It's exciting to me to see all the activity that's been happening on the NetSquared site, too — site traffic is through the roof, the community blog is on fire with people live-blogging and commenting on various sessions, and the remote conference rooms are totally buzzing. The community has really come out. If you haven't checked it out lately, you really should. It's awesome.
I've been taking some notes on the conference sessions I've attended. As I mentioned above, there are lots of folks doing a great job of live-blogging and notetaking the conference, so I'm not going to try to re-create the sessions in great detail. But I do have a lot to relate, and I'm excited to go over the high points of my day. I'll try to include notes for finding more info where I can. I'll start with the morning sessions, and I'll post about the afternoon sessions later today. Ok, here goes…
Blackwell Conversation
The conference opener was an introductory conversation with Angela Glover-Blackwell from PolicyLink, an American nonprofit policy research organization. She spoke very articulately and passionately on the importance of scrutinizing elected representatives, industry leaders and policy-makers on the basis of their progressive social agenda first, and their use of technology second. To paraphrase:
"look to the people who lead with their social agenda. Don't get snowed by tech-savvy-ness or cutting edge use of technology for its own sake. Look to the folks who have real, big ideas about people. Because if the progressive and compelling social agenda is there, the progressive technology use will follow. It has to. It's in the air now."
For more info on Angela's session, check out her session page on NetSquared. And be sure to check out the great work she and others are doing (particularly around race issues in the US) at policylink.org.
Making the most of disruption
The first plenary session of the day was about disruptive technologies (technologies that cause significant changes in the way that individuals live, businesses operate, or society behaves). Howard Rheingold and Paul Saffo were the panelists, and for experts on disruption, they were exceptionally well behaved.
They took us on a kind of casual tour through pivotal disruptive technologies of the 20th century. One of the most interesting (IMO) themes that emerged from their talk is that tools are tools, and they're nothing more until you use them.
To illustrate the point, Paul related a great story of early thinking on the implications of air travel. Apparently there was a wide-spread and popular conversation going on after the invention of airplanes about the fact that from the air, one can't see natural borders at all. And the implication of this observation, of course, was that if we can't see natural borders anymore, their importance will diminish, and we'll (finally!) see the emergence of a truly global community. Airplanes will usher in a new age. Airplanes for world peace!
Obviously (and not all that shockingly), though, airplanes have not actually brought us world peace. Similarly, emerging tools will not bring us peace on their own — tools, however cool, don't do anything on their own. Revolutionary changes come about through the strategic use of these new tools to achieve the greater good. In a room full of technologists & tool-geeks (among others), this was a brave and welcome sentiment, and it helped to set a great tone for the rest of the day.
Check out the session page on the NetSquared site for more info.
We the Media: the rise of grassroots & open-source journalism
Next up was a great panel discussion on citizen journalism featuring Dan Gillmor, Hong Eun Taek and Ethan Zuckerman, moderated by Michael Rogers.
This was perhaps the most familiar conversation of the morning for an Indymedia wonk like me. It was interesting to hear someone like Hong Eun Taek (from the Korea-turned-international news phenomenon Ohmynews.com) speak about the power and popularity of citizen-driven media, especially when it comes to predicting the future of media, on and offline. One of the nice highlights from the session was this comment from Ethan:
Whether we ask them or not, people will make media. And they'll do it before the media gets there. This idea — the citizen witness (& the citizen witness with a camera) is not a new phenomenon. (remember JFK?) But nowadays, where formerly there was maybe one image from one observer, there are now thousands.
The conversation went on to outline some of the new and interesting ways that people are contributing to and creating media, including Wikipedia, mashups & the ever-popular internet video satire, as well as blogs, vlogs, podcasts & the like. Plus, Ethan Zuckerman (of Global Voices) is a real 5-star speaker. Check him out.
For more info on this session, check out the session page on netsquared.org.
Well, that's the morning. As I said, I'll post more about day 1 later today. For now, I'm back to paying attention to the ever-inspirational Amy Goodman of DemocracyNow. Awesome!
